I rarely <a href="ht
(12/1/2015)
![]()
I rarely <a href="http://nunqyiah.com">bemcoe</a> involved with organizations such as yours, however, I find so many of the comments, etc. posted on your website to be so blatantly misleading that I feel I must respond to reveal to you your errors. Your references to the writings of Thomas Jefferson and John Adams are incomplete and misleading (either inadvertant or premeditated on your part) which can only result in creating doubt as to the veracity of your entire site and ultimately your organization. By using only selected passages to support your position you are reverting to a tactic known as Revisionism by Omission .Your example of a John Adams quote in which he stated e2809cThis would be the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in ite2809d is a prime example of the revisionists ploy of Revision by Omission'. This Adams quote is taken from a letter he wrote to Thomas Jefferson on April 19, 1870, in which Adams illustrated the intolerance often manifested between Christians in their denominational disputes. Adams recounted a conversation between two ministers he had known. A review of the entire conversation must be examined to understand Adamse28099 meaning and intent:I verily believe I was as wise and good seventy years ago, as I am now. At that period Lemuel Bryant was my parish priest, and Joseph Cleverly my Latin schoolmaster. Lemuel was a jocular and liberal scholar and divine, Joseph a scholar and a gentleman, but a bigoted Episcopalian of the school of Bishop Saunders and Dr. Hicks; a downright, conscientious, passive obedience man in church and state. The parson and the pedagogue lived much together, but were eternally disputing about government and religion. One day, when the schoolmaster had been more than commonly fanatical, and declared, e2809cif he were a monarch, he would have but one religion in his dominions,e2809d the parson coolly replied, e2809cCleverly! you would be the best man in the world, if you had no religion.e2809d Twenty times, in the course of my late reading, have I been on the point of breaking out, e2809cthis would be the best of all possible worlds, if there was no religion in it!!!e2809d But in this exclamation, I should have been as fanatical as Bryant or Cleverly. Without religion, this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in polite companye28094I mean hell. (John Adams in an 1817 letter to Thomas Jefferson, The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States , Vol 10, p 254. ).Not only is this misrepresented as being a reply from Jefferson to Adams, it is noted correctly as an Oft-Misquoted Adams Quip in your own reference. In Jeffersons' reply to Adams he did state If by religion we are to understand sectarian dogmas, in which no two of them agree, then your exclamation on that hypothesis is just, that this would be the best of worlds if there were no religion in it. . I attempted to locate the Jefferson letter to William Short on August 3, 1822 you reference on the website but have been unable to locate such a letter containing such a statement. It has been alleged that Thomas Jefferson called himself a Deist. An analysis of the historical record indicates not only did Jefferson not refer to himself as a Deist but called himself a Christian: e2809cI am a Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus.e2809d (Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol XIV, p. 385, 1904)Jefferson was fully cognizant of the many wrongs, corruptions and transgressions committed in the name of Christianity but still held to his Christianity. To the corruptions of Christianity I am, indeed opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian, in the only sense in which he wished any one to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol X, p. 380.I realize this may not be posted.Dr. Chambers
komentarz nr 1741 pi
(12/1/2015)
komentarz nr 1741 pisze: Poniżej zamieszczam<a href="http://cmsbhp.com"> ktemnoarz</a> autorstwa internautki o ksywce Basia Łaskawa.Zaznaczam, że nie jest to stanowisko Stowarzyszenia, tym bardziej, że nie było nikogo z nas na wsponianym przez Basię zebraniu. Ponieważ jednak zasady forum zobowiązują nas do publikacji, więc publikuję:Bogusława M-reaktywacja!!!!Komunikat-ostrzeżenie!!!!Osoba ciesząca się niesławą z powodf3w, o ktf3rych wszyscy wiemy, wraca do gry jako szara eminencja!! W niedzielę na zebraniu wiejskim w Porębie Żegoty bez wahania zasiadła za stołem prezydialnym przy burmistrzu, sołtysie i radnym- swoim mężu. Jak zwykle butna, arogancka i chaotyczna. Najpierw bezpodstawnie zarzuciła kłamstwo sołtysowi, sama okłamując mieszkańcf3w Poręby, potem nakrzyczała na tych , ktf3rzy nie chcą w Porębie ulic i że w domyśle, ci co nie chcą są ćwokami, a na koniec chciała żeby ulice przegłosować na tym zebraniu.Miała czelność apelować o wspf3łpracę, o nie wzniecanie konfliktf3w ale to jest nie możliwe w oparciu o nieuczciwość.Nie długo mieszkam w Porębie ale proszę mieszkańcf3w niech rozdawane przez Rodzinę Kolpinga „wyborcze” dary nie przysłonią wam rzetelnej oceny osf3b publicznych, ktf3re powinny być uczciwe i kierować się dobrem Poręby, nie własnym.Panie burmistrzu Rychlik, ponoć Bogusława M dąży do wspf3łpracy z panem. Proszę niech pan nie zadaje się z Bogusławą M, bo może to panu nie przysporzyć pozytywnej aury.Zawiedziona Barbara Ł.PS. moje spostrzeżenia umieszczam na stronie Nowej Alwerni, bo tylko wy dążycie do przejrzystości życia publicznego w gminie i do tego żeby nami rządziły osoby uczciwe.
Write a Review
Elvinette - qiWXKBr3PkdJ